Books by Bruno Latour

With the rise of science, we moderns believe, the world changed irrevocably, separating us forever from our primitive, premodern ancestors. But if we were to let go of this fond conviction, Bruno Latour asks, what would the world look like? His book, an anthropology of science, shows us how much of modernity is actually a matter of faith. What does it mean to be modern? What difference does the scientific method make? The difference, Latour explains, is in our careful distinctions between nature and society, between human and thing, distinctions that our benighted ancestors, in their world of alchemy, astrology, and phrenology, never made. But alongside this purifying practice that defines modernity, there exists another seemingly contrary one: the construction of systems that mix politics, science, technology, and nature. The ozone debate is such a hybrid, in Latour's analysis, as are global warming, deforestation, even the idea of black holes. As these hybrids proliferate, the prospect of keeping nature and culture in their separate mental chambers becomes overwhelming-and rather than try, Latour suggests, we should rethink our distinctions, rethink the definition and constitution of modernity itself. His book offers a new explanation of science that finally recognizes the connections between nature and culture-and so, between our culture and others, past and present. Nothing short of a reworking of our mental landscape. We Have Never Been Modern blurs the boundaries among science, the humanities, and the social sciences to enhance understanding on all sides. A summation of the work of one of the most influential and provocative interpreters of science, it aims at saving what is good and valuable in modernity and replacing the rest with a broader, fairer, and finer sense of possibility.

Artists and writers portray the disorientation of a world facing climate change.This monumental volume, drawn from a 2020 exhibition at the ZKM Center for Art and Media, portrays the disorientation of life in world facing climate change. It traces this disorientation to the disconnection between two different definitions of the land on which modernizing humans live: the sovereign nation from which they derive their rights, and another one, hidden, from which they gain their wealth—the land they live on, and the land they live from. Charting the land they will inhabit, they find not a globe, not the iconic "blue marble,” but a series of critical zones—patchy, heterogenous, discontinuous. With short pieces, longer essays, and more than 500 illustrations, the contributors explore the new landscape on which it may be possible for humans to land—what it means to be "on Earth,” whether the critical zone, the Gaia, or the terrestrial. They consider geopolitical conflicts and tools redesigned for the new "geopolitics of life forms.” The "thought exhibition” described in this book can opens a fictional space to explore the new climate regime; the rest of the story is unknown.Contributors includeDipesh Chakrabarty, Pierre Charbonnier, Emanuele Coccia, Vinciane Despret, Jerôme Gaillarde, Donna Haraway, Joseph Leo Koerner, Timothy Lenton, Richard Powers, Simon Schaffer, Isabelle Stengers, Bronislaw Szerszynski, Jan A. Zalasiewicz, Siegfried ZielinskiCopublished with ZKM | Center for Art and Media Karlsruhe

"Opfindsom, engageret, velskrevet" ♥♥♥♥♥ – Politiken I dette flammeskrift nytænker den anerkendte, franske antropolog Bruno Latour forbindelserne mellem ulighed, globalisering og klimakrise. Ironisk takker han Donald Trumps klimafornægtelse og USA's udtrædelse af Paris-aftalen for at overbevise mange om, at nu må der handles. Klodens velstand koncentreres på færre og færre hænder, nationalismen blomstrer og hundredetusinder af mennesker er på flugt som følge af naturkatastrofer, superstorme og oversvømmelser Ifølge Latour er nationalstaten forældet som løsningsmodel for samtidens problemer med klima, migration og finansspekulation. Sociale og territoriale spørgsmål om, hvad vi er knyttet til og hvad vi kæmper for, hænger sammen, og det europæiske samarbejde – som historisk, innovativt eksperiment – må være rammen for at besvare politisk presserende spørgsmål på tværs af traditionelle, ideologiske skel. OM FORFATTEREN Bruno Latour (f. 1947) er antropolog og filosof og regnes for en af de største, nulevende franske tænkere. Han er professor ved Sciences-Po i Paris og har udgivet et utal af bøger og artikler.

At være moderne er at kunne skelne mellem tro og viden, natur og kultur, ting og menneske. Men hvor skal vi placere fænomener som huller i ozonlaget, genmodificerede planter, reagensglasbørn, skovdød og global opvarmning? Er de naturlige eller menneskeskabte? Lokale eller globale? Begge dele? Moderne videnskab har produceret så mange komplekse teknologier og netværk, hvor kultur og natur er vævet ind i hinanden, at det bliver stadig vanskeligere i praksis at opretholde skellene mellem politik, videnskab, teknologi og natur.Vi har aldrig været moderne er en blændende analyse af paradokserne i det moderne, oplyste projekts distinktioner mellem naturvidenskab, humaniora og samfundsvidenskab, og et forsvar for en tænkning, der er hybrid og kompleks som verden selv.Latours ambitiøse og provokerende bog udkom første gang på fransk i 1991 og regnes i dag for en videnssociologisk klassisker.

Building on his earlier book We Have Never Been Modern, Bruno Latour develops his argument about the Modern fetishization of facts, or the creation of factishes.

Through case studies of scientists in the Amazon analyzing soil and in Pasteur's lab studying the fermentation of lactic acid, Latour shows us the myriad steps by which events in the material world are transformed into items of scientific knowledge.

This book establishes the conceptual context for political ecology. Latour proposes an end to the old dichotomy between nature and society-and the constitution, in its place, of a community incorporating humans and nonhumans and building on the experiences of the sciences as they are actually practiced.

Almost every town in France has a street named for Louis Pasteur-but did he alone stop people from spitting, persuade them to dig drains, influence them to get vaccinated? Latour makes the case that Pasteur's success depended upon a network of forces including the public hygiene movement, the medical profession, and colonial interests.

Emphasizing that science can only be understood through its practice, the author examines science and technology in action: the role of scientific literature, the activities of laboratories, the institutional context of science in the modern world, and the means by which inventions and discoveries become accepted.