Books by N I C C O L O

The book contains four chapters treating ingenuousness on an individual, professional, institutional, and collective level. The latter is also known as misguided patriotism. All these levels have in common that the involved (small minority) people do not at all understand why the outsiders (large majority) consider their views as ingenuous (in the sense of naive). As far as misguided patriotism is concerned: do you know any non-French who thinks of Napoleon as a hero with some kind of international legacy? Any non-Russian who considers Stalin, Lenin and Marx as noble Founding Fathers of Bolshevism? Any non-American who approves of American foreign policy? Any non- Brit who believes the government-commissioned note by Lady Justice Carol Hallett's committee, claiming that three Islamists from Pakistan and one from Jamaica were responsible for what in reality was an openly declared Mossad attack? Any non-Israeli who finds it obvious that the Mossad freely operates in all European, American, Middle-Eastern, African, and former USSR countries, while the first picture of a non-Israeli secret agent wandering about in Israel still has to be taken? What is evident in the eyes of one person, is ridiculous in the eyes of 90% of the world population. Exactly the same occurs on the professional level: a chemist will tell you that, in the end, everything boils down to chemistry; a physicist, to physics; a lawyer, to law; a psychologist, to psychology. The only sure thing is that all these scientists are as confused as a stampede of buffaloes. This book is written for people who conclude, after reading this summary: "nothing new under the sun". Why for them? Because all examples, and a quite elaborate appendix on the human spirit, contain a little bee sting that will affect their thoughts about the "practical fact" that everybody's ideas are doomed to be Einstein relative (say, on the speed of light), culture-dependent, climate-dependent, social-class-dependent, income dependent, creed-dependent, moon-tide dependent, and hemisphere-dependent.

The book considers the nine most important earthquakes in 20th century science, and shows that they are all incompatible with Deism. 1: Cosmology is the "Big Bang of our Universe": how can "nothing" explode? 2: The Origin of the First Self-Replicating Biological Cell is the "Big Bang of Unicellular Life on Earth". Deist Hoyle gave an estimate of its occurrence somewhere in the Universe: zero. 3: Animal intentionality is the "Big Bang of Spirit" irrupting into Homo Sapiens. 4: The Subjective Claim of Fundamental Rights is the "Big Bang of Probability Theory" of how 12 billion sacks of molecules manage to answer the same question (do you have fundamental rights?) in exactly the same way (yes). 5: Economy is the "Big Bang of the American Parasite" 6: John Bell is the "Big Bang of Quantum Mechanics" showing that all physical decisions are taken from outside matter 7: The "wave function collapse" is the "Big Bang of Bohr's and Heisenberg's Deist Preconceptions" 8: Kurt Gödel is the "Big Bang of Number Theory": he showed mathematically that "understanding" has nothing whatsoever in common with running a computer program, and therewith exploded Hilbert's Wettest Dreams. 9: The Holy Shroud is a "Big Bang Exploding in Michael Tite's Own Hands"

In the late 1910's, Henry Ford sr., founder of Ford Motor Company, laid hands on a book called "Protocols of The Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion", written by a certain professor Nilus in 1905 (third edition). Ford weekly published articles in his "The Dearborn Independent" to describe how well the protocols of professor Nilus corresponded to the reality of the early 1920's of the US. Not a big deal, one might object: many pundits are able to predict what will happen after fifteen years. True, but in this book the author does not argue that professor Nilus was a kind of magician able to see into the future, though a compiler of the protocols issued by a predecessor of Jacob Rothschild. The present book contains both the full text of professor Nilus, and the book that collected the 1920- 1922 articles written by Ford. On the basis of that material, the author argues that Jacob Rothschild is today's boss of an Extreme Zionistic mafia, which is at least five times the financial size of the US. It controls the complete FED, the Military, and the US foreign policy. If you do not believe the author, then at least believe Ford. If you consider even Ford too light, believe at least Benjamin Disraeli. If you think of the latter as a traitor of his bloodline, then just read the relevant historical facts, and draw your own conclusions.

This pamphlet is meant for all adults, though primarily for women: it is a political manifesto for their social status. The author suggests that his sympathizers can, on short term, equalize the social status of all women to that of men; no matter whether all these women associate with the political left or right, with traditional or recent-alternative lifestyles. An obvious rebuttal to this suggestion is that feminism, in its multiple "waves", has already been trying hard to do this during the past half century. My obvious reply is that it not only pitifully failed, but managed to make matters worse due to its retrograde ideology, which focuses exclusively on high-status directive jobs instead of on all jobs. That also men are targeted, is because the realization of a gender-independent social status, if well implemented, implies an enormous boost for a country's economy. A reader might ask: in this case, isn't your conditional ("if well implemented") the hidden warrant of such economic success? No sir: "Good implementation" only refers to respecting the econometric laws of a healthy free market, where "healthy" implies the absence of monopolies and deep-state parasites. The US heavily fails on both accounts. Remember President Kennedy's Executive Order 11110?