Join thousands of book lovers
Sign up to our newsletter and receive discounts and inspiration for your next reading experience.
By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy.You can, at any time, unsubscribe from our newsletters.
This book is a distilled academic debate among three of the best-known scholars on contemporary aspect theory, each defending his own unique interpretation while engaging the other two.
Suitable for intermediate and advanced Greek classes, this book utilizes insights from modern linguistics and communication theory in order to propose an inherent (semantic) meaning for the mood and describe the way in which it is used in the New Testament (pragmatics).
The end of the 20th and the beginning of the 21st centuries have involved much discussion on overhauling and refining a scholarly understanding of the verbal system for first-century Greek. This book seeks to apply some of that learning to the narrow realm of how prohibitions were constructed in the first-century Greek of the New Testament.
Many New Testament Greek grammarians assert that the Greek attributive participle and the Greek relative clause are "equivalent." In this book, Michael E. Hayes disproves those assertions through an analysis of every attributive participle and relative clause in the Greek New Testament.
This study finds a way forward in the understanding of the genitive case by examining concatenations of single and multiple genitives, testing methods on the Pauline corpus as a representative sample of adnominal genitive usage in the whole New Testament.
Sign up to our newsletter and receive discounts and inspiration for your next reading experience.
By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy.