We a good story
Quick delivery in the UK

Comparative advertising and price: Implementation of Directive 97/55/EC in Germany and England compared

Comparative advertising and price: Implementation of Directive 97/55/EC in Germany and England comparedBy Leonie Marder
About Comparative advertising and price: Implementation of Directive 97/55/EC in Germany and England compared

Inhaltsangabe:Abstract: With the coming into force of Directive 97/55/EC, one of the issues that arose was as to how EU Member States will choose to implement the provisions concerning admissibility of comparative advertising. This dissertation will focus on the Directive?s transposition into English and German law with special regard to price comparisons, each model of implementation being situated at the extreme end of the scale. English law, having traditionally supported comparative advertising now has had to face a much stricter approach put forward by the Directive. We shall enquire into the extent to which, in absence of an English law of unfair competition, s.10(6) of the 1994 Trade Marks Act, the torts of passing off and injurious falsehood, and the British Code of Advertising provide for compliance in that sphere. German law, on the other hand, having long opposed comparative advertising, has readily incorporated Directive 97/55 into §§2 and 3 of its 1909 Act Against Unfair Competition (UWG). German literature on the Act?s compliance with the Directive has been widespread and the respective analysis will thus be limited to assessing opinions of academics, lawyers, judges, and members of the German government. I then compared those two models of implementation from the wider angle of the civil law/common law divide and general principles underlying Community law, before finally making proposals for amendments and assessing the impact the Directive had on each national law system. Effectively, German law has thus, in my view, provided for implementation to a fuller extent, as well as being the Member State which has felt the Directive?s impact much more strongly than England. Inhaltsverzeichnis:Table of Contents: Introduction1 Chapter 1.The Law of Comparative Advertising in England7 1.1Rejection of a Law of Unfair Competition9 1.2The Law of Comparative Advertising11 1.3Implementation of Directive 97/55/EC14 Chapter 2.The Law of Comparative Advertising in Germany22 2.1The Law of Unfair Competition under the 1909 Act Against Unfair Competition22 2.2Implementation of Directive 97/55/EC26 Chapter 3.Analysis: Implementation of Directive 97/55/EC in England and Germany compared33 Conclusion43 Annex47 Bibliography47 Table of cases52 Statutory material53

Show more
  • Language:
  • English
  • ISBN:
  • 9783838683713
  • Binding:
  • Paperback
  • Pages:
  • 64
  • Published:
  • October 26, 2004
  • Dimensions:
  • 148x5x210 mm.
  • Weight:
  • 107 g.
Delivery: 1-2 weeks
Expected delivery: November 29, 2024

Description of Comparative advertising and price: Implementation of Directive 97/55/EC in Germany and England compared

Inhaltsangabe:Abstract:
With the coming into force of Directive 97/55/EC, one of the issues that arose was as to how EU Member States will choose to implement the provisions concerning admissibility of comparative advertising.
This dissertation will focus on the Directive?s transposition into English and German law with special regard to price comparisons, each model of implementation being situated at the extreme end of the scale.
English law, having traditionally supported comparative advertising now has had to face a much stricter approach put forward by the Directive. We shall enquire into the extent to which, in absence of an English law of unfair competition, s.10(6) of the 1994 Trade Marks Act, the torts of passing off and injurious falsehood, and the British Code of Advertising provide for compliance in that sphere.
German law, on the other hand, having long opposed comparative advertising, has readily incorporated Directive 97/55 into §§2 and 3 of its 1909 Act Against Unfair Competition (UWG). German literature on the Act?s compliance with the Directive has been widespread and the respective analysis will thus be limited to assessing opinions of academics, lawyers, judges, and members of the German government.
I then compared those two models of implementation from the wider angle of the civil law/common law divide and general principles underlying Community law, before finally making proposals for amendments and assessing the impact the Directive had on each national law system.
Effectively, German law has thus, in my view, provided for implementation to a fuller extent, as well as being the Member State which has felt the Directive?s impact much more strongly than England.
Inhaltsverzeichnis:Table of Contents:
Introduction1
Chapter 1.The Law of Comparative Advertising in England7
1.1Rejection of a Law of Unfair Competition9
1.2The Law of Comparative Advertising11
1.3Implementation of Directive 97/55/EC14
Chapter 2.The Law of Comparative Advertising in Germany22
2.1The Law of Unfair Competition under the 1909 Act Against Unfair Competition22
2.2Implementation of Directive 97/55/EC26
Chapter 3.Analysis: Implementation of Directive 97/55/EC in England and Germany compared33
Conclusion43
Annex47
Bibliography47
Table of cases52
Statutory material53

User ratings of Comparative advertising and price: Implementation of Directive 97/55/EC in Germany and England compared



Find similar books
The book Comparative advertising and price: Implementation of Directive 97/55/EC in Germany and England compared can be found in the following categories:

Join thousands of book lovers

Sign up to our newsletter and receive discounts and inspiration for your next reading experience.