We a good story
Quick delivery in the UK

The Absurd Hypothesis, That Eusebius Of Cæsarea ... Was An Editor Or Corrupter Of The Holy Scriptures, Exposed, [in Reply To Remarks On A Passage In Eusebius's Ecclesiastical History, By F. Nolan] In A Second Part Of The Case Of Eusebius, By The

About The Absurd Hypothesis, That Eusebius Of Cæsarea ... Was An Editor Or Corrupter Of The Holy Scriptures, Exposed, [in Reply To Remarks On A Passage In Eusebius's Ecclesiastical History, By F. Nolan] In A Second Part Of The Case Of Eusebius, By The

This book is a critique of the theory that Eusebius of Caesarea, a prominent early Christian writer and historian, intentionally edited or corrupted the Bible. The authors argue that this theory is based on a misunderstanding of Eusebius's work and that he should be seen as an important figure in the history of Christianity. This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work is in the "public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.

Show more
  • Language:
  • English
  • ISBN:
  • 9781022599642
  • Binding:
  • Paperback
  • Published:
  • July 17, 2023
  • Dimensions:
  • 156x234x3 mm.
  • Weight:
  • 86 g.
Delivery: 1-2 weeks
Expected delivery: December 5, 2024

Description of The Absurd Hypothesis, That Eusebius Of Cæsarea ... Was An Editor Or Corrupter Of The Holy Scriptures, Exposed, [in Reply To Remarks On A Passage In Eusebius's Ecclesiastical History, By F. Nolan] In A Second Part Of The Case Of Eusebius, By The

This book is a critique of the theory that Eusebius of Caesarea, a prominent early Christian writer and historian, intentionally edited or corrupted the Bible. The authors argue that this theory is based on a misunderstanding of Eusebius's work and that he should be seen as an important figure in the history of Christianity.
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it.
This work is in the "public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.
Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.

User ratings of The Absurd Hypothesis, That Eusebius Of Cæsarea ... Was An Editor Or Corrupter Of The Holy Scriptures, Exposed, [in Reply To Remarks On A Passage In Eusebius's Ecclesiastical History, By F. Nolan] In A Second Part Of The Case Of Eusebius, By The



Find similar books
The book The Absurd Hypothesis, That Eusebius Of Cæsarea ... Was An Editor Or Corrupter Of The Holy Scriptures, Exposed, [in Reply To Remarks On A Passage In Eusebius's Ecclesiastical History, By F. Nolan] In A Second Part Of The Case Of Eusebius, By The can be found in the following categories:

Join thousands of book lovers

Sign up to our newsletter and receive discounts and inspiration for your next reading experience.